Product Description Smaller than a deck of cards, this slim design takes superb, high-resolution pictures.
3.0-megapixel CMOS sensor
Up to 2032 x 1524 pixel resolution
16MB internal memory
Supports SD memory cards
4X digital zoom
1.5" color TFT display
Built-in flash with Autobrite technology
USB transfer cradle & cable
Includes photo editing software
Hand strap and carrying case
Internal rechargeable batteries
3-month manufacturer's warranty
Available in red
Ideal for travel, this slim design is easy to carry in a pocket or purse and takes the quality pictures you want. It's the perfect way to remember your adventures!
Amazon.com Product Description The Oregon Scientific DS6310-R 3MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Red) offers the perfect combination of size and image quality. This micro-size digital camera takes great two-megapixel pictures anytime, anywhere. It is small enough to carry in your pocket, has a built-in flash, 4x digital zoom and a 1.5-inch color TFT screen for great quality pictures on the go. The camera includes eight megabytes of internal memory and SD card support for extra memory. The 3.0-megapixel CMOS sensor produces high-quality images of up to 2032 x 1524-pixels. The included cradle can be used for conveniently downloading images to your computer.
What's in the Box DS6310-R digital camera, USB transfer cradle, USB cable, built-in rechargeable batteries, hand strap, carrying case, and software.
Don't buy CMOS camerasMay 6, 2008 Most good digital cameras use CCD lens technology. CMOS is old, normally used for security cameras. Even though I don't own this camera (and I generally hate reading reviews by people who don't own the product), I have owned a Polaroid camera of similar specs & price - with a CMOS lens. It mysteriously died in less than a year (company would service, but it would cost almost as much as purchase price for part) and picture quality was horrible. I regret not having done my research, b/c I took pics of my first baby with it and now with my second baby on a Canon, I can totally see the difference in quality.
General tip I've learned: if the company doesn't have a history of making cameras (35mm cameras), then don't trust it! (Kodak and Fuji are probably OK, but not the best.) I remember Oregon Scientific from the calculators I used while I was flunking calculus...!
Small lightweight cameraJune 1, 2007 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
This camera takes good pictures for being so compact. A little difficult at the begining to take a picture, but after I followed the instructions it was a snap.
NOT WORTH ITJanuary 16, 2007 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
PICTURE QUALITY FOR A 3 MEGAPIXEL CAMERA IS VERY DISAPPOINTING! THE ONLY GOOD THING IS ITS SMALL SIZE. WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS CAMERA FOR ANYTHING BUT A CHILDS TOY AND AT THE SELLING PRICE IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE FOR THAT.
Don't botherNovember 24, 2006 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Extremely low quality pics. Short battery life. Not worth spending any money on.
I got this camera for free thank goodness. Now I am just trying to find a way to get rid of it.
Pretty GoodSeptember 1, 2006 1 out of 2 found this review helpful
I got this camera back in 2003 and I loved it..i would take it everywhere...but then no too long ago it just stopd working and i really dont know what was wrong w it..but hey for a first time slim camera is not bad @ all..
amazon store
Buy Tascam from Our affiliate store , safe up to 30%!
