Format:Color, Subtitled, Widescreen, Ntsc Languages:Spanish (Subtitled), English (Original Language) Rating:Unrated Number Of Items:1 Running Time:102 Shipping Weight (lbs):0.1 Dimensions (in):7.5 x 5.3 x 0.6
Theatrical Release Date:2007 Release Date:September 23, 2008 Availability:Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping:Expedited shipping available Shipping:International shipping available Condition:******BRAND NEW****** ** Over 1.5 million orders shipped worldwide and more than 500 000 items in stock, BUY FROM A TRUSTED SOURCE, ESTABLISHED SINCE 1998 - INETVIDEO ~~~
Oh My...November 20, 2008 Which pretty much sums this up. I've never felt compelled to write a review, and as a writer with a number of books on Amazon with varying reviews, I tend not to pay too much attention, but this was an important film to me in many respects-the emphasis being on "was."
I write at night, and religiously watch all of Argento's works at least 3-4 times a year to keep myself entertained. I consider the man a genius, and even thanked him in acknowledgments in one of my books for keeping me so entertained through the years. I had been awaiting this film for several decades, admittedly with unrealistically high expectations but always in the hope that the brilliance and cinematic flair that marked so much of Argento's work would again resurface. Now, after 3 viewings, I am forced to admit that the film is not only a disappointment but is easily outshone by any other number of his works. My problem stems not from Asia Argento's performance, which was adequate, but rather from the film's look and from its plot. I would have loved an attempt to stylistically recreate some of the master set pieces from Suspiria or Inferno, the deep saturation of color, the flowing camera work of Tenebrae, the Grand Guignol atmosphere of a house of evil. It was all missing here. A few colored lights, a few filters, a few dolly shots, and more concentration on the house in Rome as a center of evil, with a malignant atmosphere-any of these things would have gone some distance in setting a tone that matched the first two parts of the trilogy. Critics of Argento like to argue his lack of plotting, but certainly the first two parts were strong in the vital issue of relating a story-and I wonder how much, if any, input Daria Nicolodi may (or may not) have had with this new film, as one suspects her grasp of the magic that so made the earlier films come to life might have helped immensely here.
So many missed opportunities, and even the echoes of previous films-of the pit of human remains from Phenomenon, of Varelli's book from Inferno-seemed pedestrian; I even thought I sensed nods to La Chiesa and to Torso, and it pains me to say that both are better, more satisfying films than this work. The only consolation is Dario's mention of a possible prequel-something I can only hope he does, and does by slavishly returning to form, even if that form is thirty years old and he might regard it as outdated. There is a reason Suspiria is a classic (like Deep Red), and Argento still has a chance to do justice to the story as I know he can do.
The ultimate test, as a truly die-hard fan of Italian horror and of Argento in particular, is Will I keep the DVD? Will I watch it often? It's a yes to the first, but a no to the second, and it saddens me to say that I even find a film like Sleepless or Stendhal Syndrome superior to Mother of Tears. It is definitely worth a watch but a watch with lowered expectations.
Mother of god...November 20, 2008 Mother of Tears (Dario Argento, 2007)
My first thought upon finishing this movie was "we waited twenty-seven years for this?". My second was "I'd be more than willing to wait another twenty-seven if we could get a movie as good as Suspiria, or even one as good as Inferno, out of this mess." The problem being, of course, that the intervening quarter-century and change has obviously disrupted Argento's thought processes on the Three Mothers, and what's left is the cheesiness of the first two movie, but without any of the atmosphere that made the first film brilliant and the second watchable, if not classic.
If you've seen a few Argento films, you know the drill here. Through machinations we see in the first few minutes, an urn is delivered to an art museum in Rome. One of the workers there, assisted by art student Sarah Mandy (Asia Argento), decides to open it. Mandy cuts her finger in the process and drips blood onto the cape contained therein, beginning the resurrection of Mater Lachrimarum, the third mother of the title. Immediately, people start going crazy in Rome, unleashing a tide of violence and mayhem, as Lachrimarum gathers an inner circle of worshipers, most of whom seem to be nubile young things who have an overweening fondness for eighties fashions. Since Sarah started this all, she feels a duty to finish it as well, and finds herself helped by supernatural powers she was unaware she had.
Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Of course it does; it's pretty standard Argento, but without any of the trappings that made so many of Argento's films such treats to watch. The director seems to have phoned this one in, drawing liberally from the work of inferior directors who were influenced by Argento back in the day (particularly Lamberto Bava; substitute a church for a movie theater and the bulk of this film comes straight from Demons). A depressing, if somewhat unsurprising, conclusion to the Three Mothers trilogy. Go rent Suspiria again instead. **
Argento? Really?November 17, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I was thrilled when I learned that Argento was finally making the final installment of his "Three Mothers" trilogy. So I pop this DVD in, sit back and.........wonder what the hell I'm watching.
Sarah (Asia Argento) is an alleged "student" at the museum of art in Rome when she and her dim-witted friend decide to open an ominous urn in order to catalog its contents. What could possibly go wrong? Well, how about getting strangled with your own intestines for starters and then pursued by a monkey from hell. Things generally go downhill from there. Apparantly Sarah is the only one who can save Rome from the eponymous "Mother of Tears." She gets some help along the way from an ineffective Udo Kier, and the spectre of her dead, puffy mother.
No one ever said Argento wrote great dialogue or cared much for the development of his characters. His great strength rests in his amazing use of color, of camera shots, cinematography, and soundtrack. How quick cutaway shots can make ordianry things (doorknobs, vents, gutters,) seem sinister. None of this is remotely present in "Mother of Tears." In fact I wouldn't be surprised if Argento didn't direct this at all. I don't see his signature on the film, and so all you're left with is water-retaining ghosts and intestines as garrotes.
I do like that references to both "Suspiria" and "Inferno" were used, but this movie doesn't even begin to come close to its predecessors. Its a sorry conclusion to his trilogy, but I live in hope that the master of giallo's next entry will be more satisfying.
It depends on how you look at itNovember 16, 2008 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Sure, I miss the wild colors and the wacky dubbing like everyone else but this still has a lot to offer. If SUSPIRIA is Argento's horror version of Disney's SNOW WHITE then MOTHER OF TEARS is his horror version of ESCAPE TO WITCH MOUNTAIN (with the visual style of a Jack Chick tract) ...and that's not necessarily a bad thing.
Absolute TrashNovember 14, 2008 3 out of 4 found this review helpful
Mother of Tears or La Terza Madre is an Italian horror film directed by Dario Argento (Tenebrae, Suspiria). It is the last film of a loosely connected trilogy created by Argento. The first film is Suspiria and the second is Inferno. Argento's influence on horror and slasher films is undeniable and it is hard for me to criticize him openly, but this was a shameless and shallow effort to say the least. Suspiria is arguably a masterpiece of the horror genre for its visual style, soundtrack, and unnerving suspense. Here though, Argento abandons those strengths in favor of gratuitous nudity and often completely ridiculous, albeit at times shocking, murder sequences. There are endless complaints about this film but most of them are quite superficial and apparent only moments in. Examples include; misplaced accents, unconvincing and often wooden acting, unlikely dialogue, and a plot that is not even worth engaging.
Sarah is played by Asia Argento (Dario's daughter). She is an American studying in Rome. She helps uncover a relic that unleashes the Mother of Tears and all of her evil powers unto the world. Worshippers across the city begin lashing out in order to honor her return and all out chaos starts.
The only thing that creeped me out about this movie was the fact that Dario Argento's film contains a gratuitous shower scene starring his own daughter. This is something he has done before and it just gives me the creeps. At least more so than a women being choked with her own intestines which is really just so ridiculous it becomes funny, but then again maybe that's your thing. I regretfully but confidently refuse to recommend this movie to anyone, even the hardcore fans.
amazon store
Buy Tascam from Our affiliate store , safe up to 30%!
